Breast Cancer CE/CME ACCREDITED Watch Time: 33 min

touchPANEL DISCUSSION The emerging role of SERDs in HR+ breast cancer: Which patients may benefit most in clinical practice?

Watch experts in breast cancer management discuss the use of current and emerging SERDs in treating HR+ breast cancer.

Prof. Hope S Rugo

UCSF Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA

CHAIR
Panelists:
Dr Matti Aapro and Dr Fatima Cardoso
 
Video Chapters
Introduction

Chair Prof. Hope Rugo introduces the expert panel and agenda for this discussion on the emerging role of SERDS in HR+ breast cancer.

view bio and disclosures 1/4 Next Chapter
 
What are the key advances in HR+ breast cancer for 2021?

The panel discusses latest updates in treatment guidelines for patients with HR+ advanced breast cancer, and the developing role of biomarkers in supporting treatment decisions.

view bio and disclosures 2/4 Next Chapter
 
Which patient subgroups require specific considerations/treatments in the breast cancer setting?

The panel consider which patient-specific factors are the most important to assess, when establishing a treatment plan for patients with HR+ breast cancer.

view bio and disclosures 3/4 Next Chapter
 
Which patients would benefit most from the oral, second-generation SERD therapies in development?

The panel review data for emerging SERDs, which are yet to be approved, and considers their potential impact on standard of care.

view bio and disclosures 4/4 Take CE/CME Test
Take CE/CME Test
Overview & Learning Objectives
Overview

In this activity, experts in breast oncology discuss the latest updates in the management of patients with HR+/HER2- breast cancer, including assessing the role of emerging SERDs.

This activity is jointly provided by USF Health and touchIME. read more

Target Audience

This activity has been designed to meet the educational needs of medical oncologists, nurse practitioners, nurses and pharmacists involved in the management of patients with breast cancer.

Disclosures

All individuals in a position to influence content have disclosed to USF Health any financial relationship with an ineligible organization. USF Health has reviewed and mitigated all relevant financial relationships related to the content of the activity.  The relevant relationships are listed below. All individuals not listed have no relevant financial relationships.

Faculty

Prof. Hope S Rugo discloses: Grants and research support from AstraZeneca, Ayala, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Macrogenics, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, OBI, Odonate Therapeutics, Pfizer, Polyphor, Roche, Seattle Genetics and Sermonix; and honoraria from Mylan, Napo, Puma and Samsung.

Dr Fatima Cardoso discloses: Advisory board/panel discussion fees from Amgen, Astellas/Medivation, AstraZeneca, Celegene, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, GE Oncology, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Macrogenics, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merus BV, Mundipharma, Mylan, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Samsung Bioepis,Sanofi, Seagen and Teva.

Dr Matti Aapro discloses: Honoraria from Accord Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, Astellas, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Biocon, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cephalon, Chugai Pharmaceuticals, Daiichi Sankyo, Dr Reddy’s Laboratories, Eisai, Genomic Health (Exact Sciences), GlaxoSmithKline, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Helsinn Healthcare SA, Hospria (Pfizer), Ipsen, Kyowa Kirin Group, Merck Serono (Merck KGaA), Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mundipharma International, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, Taiho Pharmaceuticals, Tesaro, Teva Pharmaceutical and Vifor Pharmaceuticals; consultancy fees from Accord Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celegene, Clinigen Group, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, G1 Therapeutics, Genomic Health (Exact Sciences), GlaxoSmithKline, Helsinn Healthcare SA, Hospira (Pfizer), Merck Serono (Merck KGaA), Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mundipharma International, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sandoz, Tesaro (GSK), Teva Pharmaceuticals and Vifor Pharmaceuticals; and grants/research support from Amgen, Eisai, Genomic Health (Exact Sciences), Helsinn, Hospira, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mundipharma International, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Tesaro, Teva Pharmaceutical and Vifor Pharmaceuticals.

Content reviewer

Kaitlin J Hendrix, APRN, AOCNP has no financial interests/relationships or affiliations in relation to this activity.

Touch Medical Director

Christina Mackins-Crabtree has no financial interests/relationships or affiliations in relation to this activity.

USF Health Office of Continuing Professional Development and touchIME staff have no financial interests/relationships or affiliations in relation to this activity.

Requirements for Successful Completion

In order to receive credit for this activity, participants must review the content and complete the post-test and evaluation form. Statements of credit are awarded upon successful completion of the post-test and evaluation form.

If you have questions regarding credit please contact cpdsupport@usf.edu 

Accreditations

Physicians

This activity has been planned and implemented in accordance with the accreditation requirements and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through a joint providership of USF Health and touchIME. USF Health is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.

USF Health designates this enduring material for a maximum of 0.75 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.  Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

The European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS) – European Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (EACCME) has an agreement of mutual recognition of continuing medical education (CME) credit with the American Medical Association (AMA). European physicians interested in converting AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM into European CME credit (ECMEC) should contact the UEMS (www.uems.eu)

Advanced Practice Providers

Physician Assistants may claim a maximum of 0.75 Category 1 credits for completing this activity. NCCPA accepts AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM from organizations accredited by ACCME or a recognized state medical society.

The AANPCP accepts certificates of participation for educational activities approved for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM by ACCME-accredited providers. APRNs who participate will receive a certificate of completion commensurate with the extent of their participation.

Nurses

USF Health is accredited as a provider of nursing continuing professional development by the American Nurses Credentialing Center’s Commission on Accreditation.

A maximum of 0.75 contact hour may be earned by learners who successfully complete this continuing nursing education activity. USF Health, the accredited provider, acknowledges touchIME as the joint provider in the planning and execution of this CNE activity.

This activity is awarded 0.75 ANCC pharmacotherapeutic contact hours.

Pharmacists

USF Health is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education as a provider of continuing pharmacy education. This knowledge-based program has been approved for 0.75 contact hours (0.075 CEUs). Universal program number is as follows: 0230-9999-21-005-H01-P.

Date of original release: 5 November 2021. Date credits expire: 5 November 2022.

If you have any questions regarding credit please contact cpdsupport@usf.edu

Learning Objectives

After watching this activity, participants should be better able to:

  • Describe the evolving treatment landscape for HR+ breast cancer
  • Distinguish breast cancer populations of special interest and understand the potential impact on the management and treatment of disease in these patients
  • Assess the potential of emerging SERDs in the context of the current treatment landscape for breast cancer
Faculty & Disclosures
Prof. Hope S Rugo

UCSF Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA

Hope S Rugo, MD, FASCO, is the Director of Breast Oncology and Clinical Trials Education at the UCSF Comprehensive Cancer Center, and a medical oncologist specializing in breast cancer research and treatment. She joined the Breast Care Center in 1999 after a decade of experience at University of California San Francisco (UCSF) in malignant haematology/bone marrow transplantation. She entered the field of breast cancer in order to incorporate novel therapies with excellent quality of care into the treatment of breast cancer. Dr Rugo graduated from the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine in 1983. She completed a residency in internal medicine and primary care followed by a fellowship in haematology and oncology at UCSF and was a postdoctoral fellow in immunology at Stanford University. Dr Rugo joined the faculty at UCSF in 1990. read more

Dr Rugo is principal investigator of multiple clinical trials focusing on novel targeted therapeutics to improve the treatment of breast cancer and has published widely in this area. Her research interests include immunotherapy and combinations of targeted agents to treat breast cancer, as well as the management of toxicity. She is co-chair of the Safety Committee for the multicenter adaptively randomized, phase II I-SPY2 trial; co-chair of the Triple Negative Working Group of the Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium (TBCRC); and a member of the Alliance Breast Committee. Dr Rugo is an active clinician and is committed to education. She has received a number of awards honouring her work.

Prof. Hope S Rugo discloses: Grants and research support from AstraZeneca, Ayala, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Macrogenics, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, OBI, Odonate Therapeutics, Pfizer, Polyphor, Roche, Seattle Genetics and Sermonix; and honoraria from Mylan, Napo, Puma and Samsung.
Dr Fatima Cardoso

Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center, Lisbon, Portugal

Dr Cardoso is the Director of the Breast Unit of the Champalimaud Clinical Center (CCC) in Lisbon, Portugal, and is board certified in medical oncology and internal medicine. She earned her medical degree at the University of Porto in Portugal, and completed fellowships at the Translational Research Unit of the Jules Bordet Institute (IJB) in Brussels, Belgium, and the Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology at MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, TX, USA. She then worked for 10 years as Assistant Professor at the Medical Oncology Clinic of the IJB, and served as the Scientific Director of the international research network TRANSBIG for 7 years (EU Framework VI). read more

Dr Cardoso’s research interests include the biology of breast cancer, prognostic and predictive markers of response to systemic therapy, and new anticancer agents. She is actively involved in many phase I–IV breast cancer clinical trials. She has authored about 300 publications, and has presented her work nationally and internationally. Dr Cardoso is actively involved in numerous professional organizations, such as The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and The American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), where she serves on several committees. Dr Cardoso founded, and is president of, the Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC) Global Alliance and of the ABC International Consensus Guidelines Conference.

Dr Cardoso has received educational and research grants from a number of organizations, including the Breast Cancer Research Foundation, the European Society of Medical Oncology and the European Union.

In recognition of her contributions to research in treating and managing breast cancer, Dr Cardoso has received numerous awards, including the prestigious Order of Santiago da Espada for Scientific Merit and the Flims Alumni Club (FAC) Lifetime Achievement Award.

Dr Fatima Cardoso discloses: Advisory board/panel discussion fees from Amgen, Astellas/Medivation, AstraZeneca, Celegene, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, GE Oncology, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Macrogenics, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merus BV, Mundipharma, Mylan, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Samsung Bioepis, Sanofi, Seagen and Teva.
Dr Matti Aapro

Genolier Cancer Center, Genolier, Switzerland

Matti Aapro is Director at the Genolier Cancer Center, Switzerland. Dr Aapro received his medical degree from the Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Switzerland, and subsequently completed a fellowship at the Arizona Cancer Centre in Tucson, USA, later becoming the founding chair of the Medical and Radiation Therapy Department at the European Institute of Oncology in Milan, Italy. read more

Dr Aapro is president of the European Cancer Organisation and of Sharing Progress in Cancer Care (SPCC), and a member of the board of the European School of Oncology (ESO) and the International Society for Geriatric Oncology (SIOG). Dr Aapro is a former board member of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and past president of the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC).

Dr Aapro’s major interests are new drug development, breast cancer, cancer in the elderly and supportive care. Dr Aapro has authored more than 300 publications in peer-reviewed journals. He has been the recipient of awards from Acta Oncologica, SIOG, MASCC and ASCO (BJ Kennedy prize).

Dr Matti Aapro discloses: Honoraria from Accord Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, Astellas, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Biocon, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cephalon, Chugai Pharmaceuticals, Daiichi Sankyo, Dr Reddy’s Laboratories, Eisai, Genomic Health (Exact Sciences), GlaxoSmithKline, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Helsinn Healthcare SA, Hospria (Pfizer), Ipsen, Kyowa Kirin Group, Merck Serono (Merck KGaA), Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mundipharma International, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, Taiho Pharmaceuticals, Tesaro, Teva Pharmaceutical and Vifor Pharmaceuticals; consultancy fees from Accord Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celegene, Clinigen Group, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, G1 Therapeutics, Genomic Health (Exact Sciences), GlaxoSmithKline, Helsinn Healthcare SA, Hospira (Pfizer), Merck Serono (Merck KGaA), Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mundipharma International, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sandoz, Tesaro (GSK), Teva Pharmaceuticals and Vifor Pharmaceuticals; and grants/research support from Amgen, Eisai, Genomic Health (Exact Sciences), Helsinn, Hospira, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mundipharma International, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Tesaro, Teva Pharmaceutical and Vifor Pharmaceuticals.
Downloads

View and download resources from this activity to support your learning and share with colleagues

Download Slides
Register to touchONCOLOGY for FREE
  • Peer-reviewed journals and expert opinions
  • Interactive CME and e-learning modules
  • Video conference highlights
Register For Free Now
This Activity is Funded By:

An independent medical education grant from Sanofi Genzyme.
This medical education is provided by USF Health and touchIME.

The information provided by this CE activity is for continuing education purposes only and is not meant to substitute for the independent medical/clinical judgment of a healthcare provider relative to diagnostic and treatment options of a specific patient’s medical condition.

USF is an Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action / Equal Access Institution.

USF Health is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education, the American Nurses Credentialing Center and the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education to provide continuing education to healthcare professionals. As an accredited provider, USF Health is required to disclose personal information to relevant accredited bodies that certify CE to process credits/contact hours, comply with reporting requirements, and for internal recordkeeping and regulatory purposes. USF Health does not share or sell any individual’s contact information or unique identifiers to any commercial supporter, advertiser, or third party without the specific permission of the individual.

Unapproved products or unapproved uses of approved products may be discussed by the faculty; these situations may reflect the approval status in one or more jurisdictions. The presenting faculty have been advised by touchIME and USF Health to ensure that they disclose any such references made to unlabelled or unapproved use. No endorsement by touchIME or USF Health of any unapproved products or unapproved uses is either made or implied by mention of these products or uses in touchIME or USF Health activities. touchIME and USF Health accept no responsibility for errors or omissions.

This content is intended for healthcare professionals.

Date of original release: 5 November 2021. Date credits expire: 5 November 2023.

This content is intended for healthcare professionals only. Please confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

Accept Decline
CE/CME Test (0.75 Points) Close
CE/CME Test

To obtain the CME credit(s), please complete this post-test. Please complete and click to see your results and continue.
Question 1/5
How has the standard of care changed recently for patients with advanced HR+/HER2- breast cancer?

AI, aromatase inhibitor; CDK4/6, cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitor; ET, endocrine therapy; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; HR, hormone receptor.
 Correct

A CDK4/6 inhibitor combined with ET is now the recommended standard of care for patients with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer, based on the OS benefit seen in first- and second-line settings, substantial PFS benefit and good toxicity profile.1

Similarly, NCCN guidelines also include an AI in combination with CDK4/6 inhibitors as a category 1 first-line option for HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer.2

Abbreviations

AI, aromatase inhibitor; CDK4/6, cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6; ET, endocrine therapy; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; HR, hormone receptor; NCCN, National Comprehensive Cancer Network; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival.

References

  1. Cardoso F, et al. Ann Oncol. 2020;31:1623–49.
  2. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology, Breast Cancer, Version 7.2021, August 23, 2021. Available at: www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/breast.pdf (accessed 13 September 2021).
Question 2/5
You are establishing a treatment strategy for a patient with advanced HR+/HER2- breast cancer. What are the most important mutations to consider?

BRCA, BReast CAncer gene; ESR1, estrogen receptor 1; HR, hormone receptor; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; PIK3CA, phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha.
 Correct

In addition to HR and HER2 status, treatment choices should consider BRCA status and PIK3CA. In HR+ BRCA-associated advanced breast cancer, a PARP inhibitor should be offered second-line, after a CDK4/6 inhibitor with or without ET, due to the reported OS benefit seen with them. If the PI3K inhibitor, alpelisib, is available, patients should also be tested for PIK3CA mutation.1,2

One of the mechanisms of resistance to hormonal therapies includes the acquisition of ESR1 mutations, which are frequently observed in patients with advanced breast cancer who have previously been treated with AIs (20–40%).1 However, ESR1 mutation status assessment is not yet ready for routine clinical use and is not recommended, either for demonstration of disease progression or selection of hormonal treatment.1

Abbreviations

AI, aromatase inhibitor; BRCA, BReast CAncer gene; CDK4/6, cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6; ESR1, estrogen receptor 1; ET, endocrine therapy; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; HR, hormone receptor; OS, overall survival; PARP, polyadenosine diphosphate ribose polymerase; PI3K, phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase; PIK3CA, phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha.

References

  1. Cardoso F, et al. Ann Oncol. 2020;31:1623–49.
  2. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology, Breast Cancer, Version 7.2021, August 23, 2021. Available at: www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/breast.pdf (accessed 13 September 2021).
Question 3/5
A premenopausal woman, 35 years of age, presents with advanced HR+ cancer, evidence of visceral disease and gBRCA2 mutation. What treatment would you recommend?

AI, aromatase inhibitor; CDK4/6, cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6; gBRCA, germline BReast CAncer gene; HR, hormone receptor; OFS/OFA, ovarian function suppression/ovarian function ablation; PARP, poly-adenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase.
 Correct

Many clinical trials in HR+ advanced breast cancer exclude premenopausal women. However, all available data suggest that ET is the preferred option for HR+ disease, including in young women, and even in the presence of visceral disease. Prior to treatment, pre- and perimenopausal women should have OFS/OFA.1,2

In HR+ gBRCA-associated advanced breast cancer, the optimal sequence between a PARP inhibitor and ET with or without a CDK4/6 inhibitor is unknown. However, guidelines recommend using CDK4/6 inhibitors before a PARP inhibitor, because of the OS benefit seen with these agents.1 For example, in the MONALEESA-7 trial, which included premenopausal women with HR+ HER2- advanced breast cancer, the estimated OS at 42 months was 70.2% in the CDK4/6 inhibitor + ET group, versus 46.0% in the placebo group (ET alone).3

Abbreviations

CDK4/6, cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6; ET, endocrine therapy; gBRCA, germline BReast CAncer; HR, hormone receptor; OFS/OFA, ovarian function suppression/ovarian function ablation; OS, overall survival; PARP, poly-adenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase.

References

  1. Cardoso F, et al. Ann Oncol. 2020;31:1623–49.
  2. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology, Breast Cancer, Version 7.2021, August 23, 2021. Available at: www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/breast.pdf (accessed 13 September 2021).
  3. Im S-A, et al. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:307–16.
Question 4/5
Which of the following statements best reflects the rationale for the ongoing phase II AMEERA-3 and phase III EMERALD trials of amcenestrant and elacestrant, respectively, in patients with HR+/HER2- breast cancer?

AI, aromatase inhibitor; CDK4/6, cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; HR, hormone receptor; PIK3CA, phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha; PK, pharmacokinetic.
 Correct

AMEERA-3 is an international, prospective, open-label, randomized phase II study (NCT04059484) designed to assess safety and efficacy of amcenestrant in patients with ER+ (>1%)/HER2- metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer, with disease progression on ≥6 months of continuous ET (0–2 lines in the metastatic setting). Prior CDK4/6 inhibitors are allowed.1

EMERALD is an international, randomized, open-label, active-controlled, phase III study comparing the efficacy and safety of elacestrant with standard of care ET in patients with metastatic/advanced ER+/HER2- breast cancer. Part of the objective of this trial is to establish whether elacestrant prolongs time to disease progression in patients who have ESR1 mutations known to confer endocrine resistance.2

Abbreviations

CDK4/6, cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6; ER, estrogen receptor; ESR1, estrogen receptor 1; ET, endocrine therapy; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2.

References

  1. Tolaney S, et al. Cancer Res. 2021;81(Suppl. 4):OT–09–09.
  2. Bardia A, et al. Future Oncol. 2019;15:3209–18.
Question 5/5
A patient presents with metastatic breast cancer, and has been treated with an AI and CDK4/6 inhibitor in the first-line setting. She has ESR1 mutations in bone and liver metastatic tumours. She expresses a strong aversion to injections. Which of the following scenarios would you choose, assuming a newer SERD with at least equivalent efficacy to fulvestrant has been approved and is readily available?

AI, aromatase inhibitor; CDK4/6, cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6; ESR1, estrogen receptor 1; PIK3CA, phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha; SERD, selective estrogen receptor degrader; WT, wild type.
 Correct

Fulvestrant has shown activity in patients with tumours harbouring mutations in the ESR1 gene.1 However, it is delivered by means of injection, which can be a significant deterrent for some patients.2 The second-generation SERDs are all administered orally and are capable of reducing ER protein expression and blocking estrogen-dependent and -independent ER signalling. Newer SERDs are, therefore, considered a significant therapeutic approach to treat HR+ breast cancer in both early stage and more advanced drug-resistant cases, such as patients with ESR1-mutant tumours.3

Abbreviations

ESR1, estrogen receptor 1; HR, hormone receptor; SERD, selective estrogen receptor degrader.

References

  1. Rocca A, et al. Cancer Manag Res. 2018;10:3083–99.
  2. Fallowfield L, et al. Ann Oncol. 2006;17:205–10.
  3. Hernando C, et al. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:7812.
Post Test Feedback Close
Step 1: Post CE/CME Test Feedback

Please note this feedback form is compulsory to complete your CE/CME evaluation

* = Mandatory Field

Please complete this short online feedback form.
Please indicate how well each statement met your expectations.
Accreditation Close
Accreditation

Please provide your details so that we can send you your certificate, which will be emailed to the address provided. All fields are required.

* = Mandatory Field
Your Accreditation Close
Your Accreditation

Thank you for your submission. Your certificate has been emailed to you.

Copied to clipboard!
accredited arrow-down-editablearrow-downarrow_leftarrow-right-bluearrow-right-dark-bluearrow-right-greenarrow-right-greyarrow-right-orangearrow-right-whitearrow-right-bluearrow-up-orangeavatarcalendarchevron-down consultant-pathologist-nurseconsultant-pathologistcrosscrossdownloademailexclaimationfeedbackfiltergraph-arrowinterviewslinkmdt_iconmenumore_dots nurse-consultantpadlock patient-advocate-pathologistpatient-consultantpatientperson pharmacist-nurseplay_buttonplay-colour-tmcplay-colourAsset 1podcastprinter scenerysearch share single-doctor social_facebooksocial_googleplussocial_instagramsocial_linkedin_altsocial_linkedin_altsocial_pinterestlogo-twitter-glyph-32social_youtubeshape-star (1)tick-bluetick-orangetick-red tick-whiteticktimetranscriptup-arrowwebinar Sponsored Department Location NEW TMM Corporate Services Icons-07NEW TMM Corporate Services Icons-08NEW TMM Corporate Services Icons-09NEW TMM Corporate Services Icons-10NEW TMM Corporate Services Icons-11NEW TMM Corporate Services Icons-12Salary £ TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-01TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-02TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-03TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-04TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-05TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-06TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-07TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-08TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-09TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-10TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-11TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-12TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-13TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-14TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-15TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-16TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-17TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-18TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-19TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-20TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-21TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-22TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-23TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-24TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-25TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-26TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-27TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-28TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-29TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-30TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-31TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-32TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-33TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-34TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-35TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-36TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-37TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-38TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-39TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-40TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-41TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-42TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-43TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-44TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-45TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-46TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-47TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-48TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-49TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-50TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-51TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-52TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-53TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-54TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-55TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-56TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-57TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-58TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-59TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-60TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-61TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-62TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-63TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-64TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-65TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-66TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-67TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-68TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-69TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-70TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-71TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-72
Close Popup